【摘要】 外国判决承认与执行中的诉讼竞合审查包括对两项外国判决承认冲突、内国判决与外国判决承认冲突、内国未决诉讼和外国判决承认冲突的审查。各国基于一事不再理原则,一般根据时间优先原则确定是否承认和执行外国判决。我国2015年民事诉讼法司法解释第533条是确立判决承认和执行阶段诉讼竞合审查的法律依据。在立法模式上,将管辖权阶段的诉讼竞合协调和判决承认和执行阶段的诉讼竞合审查合并立法,忽视了判决承认和执行条件审查的独立性;立法规范上,存在诉讼竞合的认定标准模糊,诉讼竞合审查类型不够周全、时间点确定欠缺合理性等问题,影响到法院对诉讼竞合的审查。我国未来完善立法时,应将第533条一分为二,将外国判决承认和执行中的诉讼竞合审查事项独立出来,单独作为我国承认和执行外国法院判决的一项审查条件,与其他审查事项集中规定。明确相同当事人和相同诉因是诉讼竞合的认定标准,补充完善诉讼竞合审查的类型,对于两项外国判决承认和执行冲突采用先申请原则;对我国生效判决与外国判决承认冲突采用先判决原则;对我国未决诉讼与外国判决承认采用先受理原则。更多还原

【Abstract】 Parallel proceedings review in recognition and enforcement of foreign civil and commercial judgments includes conflicts of foreign judgments, domestic judgment and foreign judgments, domestic pending litigation and foreign judgments. Based on the principle of non bis in idem, time preference is a key factor in deciding recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Article 533 of Judicial Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law by Supreme Court in 2015, as the law regulated parallel proceedings review in recognition of foreign judgments, takes mode of double rules and is considered lack of independence with vague scope, incomplete objects, unconscionable criterion of timing determination. Parallel proceedings review with specific scope and object shall be an independent condition of recognition of foreign judgments,including the first-to-apply principle in reviewing conflicts of foreign judgments, the first-to-judge principle in reviewing conflicts of domestic judgment and foreign judgment, the first-to-file principle in reviewing conflicts of domestic pending litigation and foreign judgments.更多还原