节点文献

生理学试卷传统和情景式选择题的比较

Comparison of the traditional and situational choice questions in the physiological examination

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李烁郭玲庞炜李肖霞陈曼宋德懋祝世功

【Author】 LI Shuo;GUO Ling;PANG Wei;LI Xiao-xia;CHEN Man;SONG De-mao;ZHU Shi-gong;Dept.of Physiology and Pathophysiology,Peking University Health Science Center;

【机构】 北京大学医学部生理学与病理生理学系

【摘要】 目的评估情景式考题对生理学试卷质量和考察学生能力的作用。方法以难度系数和区分度为指标,比较试卷情景式和传统选择题的考核效果。结果情景式考题难度系数比传统考题有所增加,且情景式考题的区分度更合理。理解型情景式考题区分度高于传统的记忆型和理解型考题,应用型情景式考题区分度与相应的传统考题相比没有差别。结论情景式考试题不仅能提高试卷质量,更能考察和评估学生的学习能力。

【Abstract】 Objective Evaluating the effect of situational questions for qualifying the students’ abilities in physiology examination. Methods Comparing the difficulty coefficients and discrimination indexes between situational and traditional choice questions. Results Compared with the traditional choice questions,the difficulty coefficient of situational questions increased,while the discrimination indexes were more reasonable. The discrimination indexes of situational understanding questions were higher than those of the traditional memory and understanding questions.There were no difference between discrimination indexes of the situational application questions and those of traditional application questions. Conclusions Situational questions not only improved the quality of examinations,but also facilitate evaluating students’ learning ability.

【基金】 北京大学医学部教育教学研究重点立项课题[北医(2014)部教字177号]
  • 【文献出处】 基础医学与临床 ,Basic & Clinical Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年01期
  • 【分类号】R-4;G642
  • 【被引频次】6
  • 【下载频次】103
节点文献中: