【摘要】 我国法对不可抗力以折中标准加以认定,其指不能预见、不能避免并不能克服的客观情况。不可抗力使侵权责任第一层要件不成立。免责事由说会引起法律逻辑矛盾;抗辩事由说混淆了广义的抗辩与狭义的抗辩。过错责任中完全因不可抗力造成损害的,无侵权行为,故无所谓侵权责任;无过错责任中完全因不可抗力造成损害的,侵权责任的归责事由是先前的危险行为,不可抗力本身并不具有可归责性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Force majeure is certified by compromised standards, which indicates unforeseeable, unavoidable and insurmountable objective circumstances. It excludes the liability of tort by making the first layer meanings of tort liability unformed. Disclaimer will cause the contradiction of legal logic. The defense is confused by the broad defense and the defense of the narrow sense. Fault liability is completely due to force majeure caused by damage, no infringement. So there is no so-called tort liability. No liability for damage caused by force majeure,the liability attribution grounds for tort liability arises from previous dangerous acts, and the force majeure itself is not attributable.更多还原