【摘要】 反恐背景下美国对酷刑的禁止有所松动,理论试图摆脱国际法对绝对禁止酷刑的限制。英美法系对酷刑犯罪的规制上,入罪门槛较高,出罪路径宽。首先,酷刑犯罪纯粹个人法益的定位使得紧急避险更易成立;其次,胁迫的出罪事由不受法益衡量的限制,在限度条件上更为宽松;最后,功利主义、政府干预、生命权至上等观念都使得美国民众对酷刑营救的接受度较高。另一方面,美国对酷刑证据的排除较为严格,通过降低酷刑收益减少酷刑。英美法系的立法模式值得我国借鉴,尤其在对法益进行改造后承认酷刑可以通过紧急避险出罪。更多还原

【Abstract】 The ban of turture in America under the background of anti-terrorism is looser. The theory tries to get off the strain of torture of law of nations.Regarding the regulation of turture crimes in anglo-american criminal law,the entry threshold is high,and the way of decrimininalization is wide.Firstly,the emergency action is easy to justified.Secondly,the excuse of duress does not restricted by the measurement of legal interst,and is not strict in the atandard.Finally,utilitarian,the intervene of government and the concept of’life is most important’cause the acception of turture in civilians is common.On the other hand,the prosedure of eliminating evidence by torturing is limited to reduce the benefit of turture.The mode of legislation of anglo-american criminal law can be learnt,especially eliminating the turture crimes by emergency action.更多还原