节点文献
瑞替普酶与尿激酶溶栓治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的疗效对比研究
Comparison of the therapeutic effect between reteplase and urokinase on the treatment of patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction
【摘要】 目的探讨基层医院急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)溶栓疗法中不同溶栓剂的选择和应用。方法 90例STEMI患者随机分为A组和B组各45例,A组采用瑞替普酶治疗,B组采用尿激酶溶栓治疗,比较两组的疗效及安全性。结果与B组比较,A组血管再通率较高(88.9%vs 71.1%,P<0.05),特别是发病时间>6 h者(66.7%vs 12.5%P<0.05);A组出院前左心室射血分数(LVEF)较高,脑钠肽(BNP)较低(P<0.05),心功能较好。两组均无致死性大出血及脑出血。结论瑞替普酶能早期快速开通梗死相关血管,减少心肌损伤,改善心功能和预后,是STEMI患者的更佳选择。
【Abstract】 Objective To summarize the thrombolytic therapy for the patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction( STEMI) in a primary hospital. Methods Ninety patients with STEMI in our hospital from November 2013 to November 2015 were randomly divided into two groups: group A( n = 45) and group B( n = 45).Group A was treated with reteplase and group B received urokinase. The clinical effect and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Compared with group B,group A had a higher revascularization rate two hours( 88. 9% vs 71. 1%,P < 0. 05),or six hours( 66. 7% vs 12. 5%,P < 0. 05)after the thrombolytic therapy. Compared with group B,group A had a higher ejection fration,a lower BNP level and better cardiac function( P < 0. 05). There were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding and death between the two groups. Conclusion Reteplase can recanalize the infarct-ralated arteries,reduce myocardial injury,improve the heart function and prognosis in the patients with early STEMI.
【Key words】 Acute myocardial infarction; Reteplase(r-PA); Urokinase(UK); Thrombolytic therapy;
- 【文献出处】 中国临床新医学 ,Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年09期
- 【分类号】R542.22
- 【被引频次】6
- 【下载频次】26