【摘要】 目的评价喘乐宁与爱喘乐雾化吸入治疗幼儿毛细支气管炎的临床护理效果及其疗效。方法观察我院收治的幼儿毛细支气管炎患者86例,随机分成A组(43例)和B组(43例)。两组患儿均采用补水,止咳等常规治疗,A组患儿使用爱喘乐雾化吸入进行治疗,B组使用喘乐宁雾化吸入治疗,治疗护理10d后比较两组治疗护理效果。结果经过10d治疗护理后,A组总有效率为95.35%,B组为69.76%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗护理过程中出现了一些不良反应,涉及全身多个系统,A组中有9.3%出现了不良反应,B组不良反应发生率为34.88%,两组不良反应发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论喘乐宁和爱喘乐雾化吸入剂均可治疗幼儿毛细支气管炎,但爱喘乐不良作用小,治疗效果更好。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the efficacies of Ventolin with Atrovent via nebulization inhalation for therapy of children with bronchiolitis. Methods 86 children with bronchiolitis, admitted to our department between March 2012 and March 2013, were equally randomized into group A and group B. On conventional therapy basis(including supplement of clear fluids and relief of the cough), group A received Ventolin, and group B were given Atrovent through atomization inhalation. Then the two groups were compared for the nursing effects after 10 days of inhalation. Results After 10 days of therapy and nursing, the total effective rate was 95.35% for group A and 25.59% for group B. The difference was significant(P<0.05). Some adverse reactions involved in multiple body systems occurred in the course of therapy. The incidence of adverse effect was9.3% in group A and 34.88% in group B(P<0.05). Conclusion Both Ventolin and Atrovent inhalation may be effective to children with bronchiolitis, yet Atrovent can be better therapeutic results with less adverse reactions.更多还原