【摘要】 鲍德里亚在使用消费概念来构建对消费社会的批判时,仅仅将批判停留在文化的表层,他忽略了产生这种消费文化的物质基础。因而在鲍德里亚那里,生产理论和消费活动是割裂的。他没有意识到自己理论的形而上学性质,反而企图使用符号这个功能性表称整合人与物的世界,并将物和人作为符号系统的产物来看待。这可谓是一种黑格尔客观精神的唯心论变种,因为它忽略了消费社会现实的经济状况,从而忽略了人的生产实践活动。而这一点却恰恰是马克思历史唯物主义的核心思想,体现出马克思哲学革命的实质。鲍德里亚的做法背离了马克思生产实践活动基础上的唯物主义,也在一定程度上削弱了这种符号消费理论的批判力度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Baudrillard’s constructing a consumption society by the notion of consumption retains its criticism on the surface of culture. He ignored the substantial foundation for this consumption culture where production and consumption are detached from each other. He failed to realize the metaphysical nature of his theory,but intended to combine the world of human and that of objects through symbols as functioning references and to regard objects and human as the output of a symbolic system. His theory could be taken as a transformation of Hegel’s objective idealism which missed real economic conditions for a consumption society as well as its production activities by human. What is absent in Baudrillard ’s theory is the essence of Marxist materialism and Marxist philosophical revolution.Baudrillard’s criticism deviates from Marxist production-based materialism,thus weakens its own critical strength.更多还原