【摘要】 知假买假行为是否适用《消费者权益保护法》的惩罚性赔偿是近年来人们争议颇多的话题。2013年12月9日,最高人民法院审判委员会通过了《最高人民法院关于审理食品药品纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》。其第3条明确购买者明知食品、药品存在质量问题而购买的,不影响其向生产者、销售者主张惩罚性赔偿。随着规定的出台,法学理论界和实务界出现了主张"全民打假"的思潮,认为知假买假行为适用《消费者权益保护法》的惩罚性赔偿可以遏制当前我国假冒伪劣商品的乱象。但是,"全民打假"不符合现代社会的法治理念,陷入了通过群众性运动解决社会问题的历史惯性思维。知假买假行为不适用《消费者权益保护法》的惩罚性赔偿,该《规定》第3条只是例外规定。更多还原

【Abstract】 Whether punitive damage of the Law on the Protection of Consumer’s Rights and Interests is applicable to consumers who buy fake products on purpose is a disputed topic in recent years.On December 9th,2013,The judicial committee of the Supreme People’s Court passed the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the application of law to a number of food and drug disputes(Hereinafter referred to as the Provisions).The article 3 of the Provisions clearly prescribed that the purchaser who buying fake products on purpose can also claim for punitive damages to the producer or the seller.According to the article 3,either theoretical or practical circle of law have advocated "a mass campaign against fake".Buying fake products on purpose can also apply for the punitive damages so that to curb the current chaos of fake and shoddy goods.In our opinion, "a mass campaign against fake" does not fit the idea of law in modern society,which falling in the historical conventional wisdom that to solve the social problems by a mass campaign.Buying fake products on purpose should not apply for the punitive damage according to the Law on the Protection of Consumer’s Rights and Interests,so the article3 of the Provisions is just an exception rule.更多还原