【摘要】 在实体法上具有共同权利义务的民事主体,并非意味着必须要求全体一起共同行使权利或承担义务;基于实体法要求,在一些情况下,共同权利或义务必须全体民事主体一起实施方为适格,即固有必要共同诉讼;但在多数情况下,共同权利或义务中的部分主体提起诉讼、提出请求或者被诉承担责任,仍属主体适格,即类似必要共同诉讼;我国过分注重必要共同诉讼程序上合一裁判效果,忽视了民事主体实体法上的请求权,体现出浓厚的法院职权主义色彩;共有物权关系纠纷并非都是固有必要共同诉讼;债权人撤销权诉讼中债务人与受益人须作为共同被告。更多还原

【Abstract】 Being the civil subjects who share common rights and obligations in the substantial law,do not mean they have to exercise their right or undertake their obligations all together. Based on the substantial law,in some cases,common rights or obligations must be exercised by all the civil subjects all together,namely inherent necessary common litigation.But in most cases part of the subjects bring a lawsuit,make a request or be asked to undertake their obligations,and the subject is also the proper ones,namely the similar necessary common litigation. Our country excessively attaches importance to the procedural unified effect of the judgment,and neglects the civil subjects’ right of claim in the substantial law,from which we can see strong doctrine color of functions and powers of the court. Not all the disputes about the common real right relationship are inherent common necessary litigations. In the litigation of creditor’s repealing rights,the debtor and the beneficiary must be common defendants.更多还原