节点文献

干预Ⅰ类切口清洁手术围手术期预防用药的多因素比较

Class I Clean Surgical Incision Intervention Perioperative Prophylaxis of Multi-factor Comparison

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 苏煌财林玉仙张宏林嘉宏林青

【Author】 SU Huang-cai,LIN Yu-xian,ZHANG Hong,LIN Jia-hong,LIN Qing(Department of Clinical Pharmacy,the First Hospital of Fuzhou,Fuzhou,Fujian 350009,China)

【机构】 福州市第一医院临床药学科

【摘要】 目的找出更有效的干预Ⅰ类切口清洁手术围手术期预防用药的方式方法。方法比较3种干预手段"相关管理规定、相关管理规定+临床药师、相关管理规定+临床药师+行政干预"分别对Ⅰ类切口清洁手术围手术期预防用药的作用,各取3个月比较合理率,采用χ2检验。结果 3种干预手段有显著差异,优越顺序为相关管理规定+临床药师+行政干预、相关管理规定+临床药师、相关管理规定。结论"相关管理规定+临床药师+行政干预"干预方法效果更明显。

【Abstract】 Objective To identify more effective interventions Class I clean surgical incision perioperative prophylaxis ways.Methods The effect of 3 interventions: relevant regulations,relevant regulations+clinical pharmacists and relevant regulations+clinical pharmacists+administrative intervention respectively,on Class I clean surgical incision perioperative prophylaxis were compared.The reasonable rate of each intervention in 3 months was compared,using χ2 test.Results The effect of the 3 interventions were significantly different.The effect of relevant regulations+clinical pharmacists+administrative intervention is the best,and the effect of clinical pharmacists+relevant regulations is better than relevant regulations.Conclusion "Relevant regulations+clinical pharmacists+administrative intervention " is more effective.

  • 【文献出处】 今日药学 ,Pharmacy Today , 编辑部邮箱 ,2012年02期
  • 【分类号】R619
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】97
节点文献中: