【摘要】 和谐社会的建构应以法治为根基。法治在司法上表现为认真对待规则,重视文义解释,尊重法律文本的权威。司法克制抑或司法能动体现了法官释法的两种不同的司法哲学,其主要分歧在于法官行使自由裁量权的范围或限度。当下的法官拥有广泛的法律解释权,司法能动处于无序状态,应予以合理规制;法官应当奉行司法克制主义,认真对待和尊重规则,依据法律文本的含义解释法律,从而建构裁判规范,以确保法律意义的安全与稳定。更多还原

【Abstract】 The construction of harmonious society should be based on the rule of law. In judicial practice,the rule of law is characterized by dealing with the rule seriously, attaching weight to literal interpretation, and respecting the authority of legal text. Judicial restraint or judicial activism impersonates the two distinct judicial philosophies when interpreting the law, and the chief divergence of the two philosophy lies in the problem that the confinement and limitation of the free ruling power judges could perform. At present, judges enjoy broad power of law interpretation. Judicial activism is in an utterly disorderly state and should be rationally regularized. Judges are required to be judicially restraint to take statues and regulations seriously, to interpret the law according to the connotation of the law text, so as to construct judicational norm to assure the safety and stability in terms of law.更多还原