【摘要】 研究不同心肺复苏(CPR)授课方法对提升非医学生CPR技能的作用;随机问卷调查CPR理论选修班(理论班)和操作培训班(操作班)学生CPR知识与技能掌握程度;用预调查、重复性调查等控制偏倚和误差;统计采用2检验,P<0.05有显著性。结果显示:第一,CPR理论知识评估,操作性指标操作班均显著高于理论班,理论性指标两班无显著差别。第二,自信力评估,理论与实践均未掌握者和仅掌握理论者,理论班均高于操作班;理论与实践均掌握者,操作班显著高于理论班。第三,CPR技能评估,掌握者和熟悉者理论班均显著低于操作班;了解者理论班显著高于操作班。可见对非医学生CPR授课,操作培训方法显著优于纯理论培训方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper studies the effictiveness of different instructional methods of CPR(cardiopulmonary resuscitation) on non-medical majors.A questionnaire about CPR knowledge and skills was randomly conducted among the students from optional theoretical class and operative class of CPR,using pre-survey and repeated survey to avoid error and bias,adopting 2 test to analyze statistics,its Kappa coefficient range is significant P<0.05.The findings reveal the following: Firstly,students of operative class perform significantly better than those of theoretical class in both CPR knowledge and skills while there is no great difference between the two classes in theoretical level;Secondly,in terms of students who fail to acquire CPR knowledge and skills,those in theoretical class are more confident than those in operative class.Otherwise,the latter show better CPR performance than the former;Thirdly,CPR proficiency of students in theoretical class is obviously lower than that in operative class.Thus it can be seen that operative training is far more advantageous than theoretical training in CPR teaching for non-medical majors.更多还原