【摘要】 比较目前国际自愿碳汇市场主要补偿标准的特点及优缺点。结果表明:CDM-AR标准是目前能确保项目"碳补偿"额外性的较为理想的标准;AFOLU-VCS是在确保项目基本质量要求的基础上,最能体现项目审定和核查成本有效性的标准;CCBS是最能实现生物多样性保护和社区效益的项目设计标准;生存计划方案是有助于缓解贫困和多重效益的标准。提出我国应该采用AFOLU-VCS与CCBS相结合的方法设计和实施自愿碳汇项目的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Advantage and disadvantage were compared among the main carbon offset standards for international voluntary carbon sequestration market. It was indicated that CDM-AR (Afforestation and Reforestation Standard under CDM) is a better offset standard on insuring the additional for carbon offset.AFOLU-VCS is a standard that reflects costs efficiency for validation and verification while still ensuring basic quality requirement. CCBS is standard that achieves biodiversity conservation and community benefits.Plan vivo system is a standard that helps to relieve the proverty and achieved multiple benefits. It was proposed that the combination of AFOLU-VCS with CCBS should be implemented in voluntary carbon sequestration projects in China.更多还原