【摘要】 "回归"派对"转向"的批评,一方面提醒我们不要忘"本",另一方面却又借口翻译学边界的确定将外部研究排斥于翻译学之外。本体研究与外部研究均属于翻译研究的范畴,两者是互补关系,没有主次之分;研究热点、重点是有阶段性的;翻译学的体系应该是开放的,为翻译学画地为牢、修墙筑垒并不利于它的繁荣与发展。各派各说应该互相包容;对各种翻译研究范式的正确态度是:恋旧但不要守旧,求新但不应该喜新厌旧。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper points out that the criticism from the school for ’ontological return’ against ’the turn to outside study’ reminds us not to forget the nature of translation study,but meanwhile,it excludes outside study from translation study for a pretense of determining the boundary of translation study.It puts ontological(i.e.linguistic) and outside study into the scope of translation study,arguing that they are equally important and complementing each other.It holds that there exists a study of focus in a period;the system of translation study should be open to other disciplines for the sake of the further development of translation study.It advises all schools should be tolerant of each other and take correct attitudes towards different approaches to translation study,that is,we can be nostalgic but cannot be conservative,and should pursue the new but should not get tired of the old.更多还原