节点文献

不同类型护理本科生评判性思维能力调查与思考

Critical thinking of different levels of undergraduate nursing students

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王庆华郝玉玲林振涛徐仁华孙丽红郝朝娜

【Author】 WANGQinghua, HAO Yuling, LIN Zhentao, et al.Nursing school of Binzhou Medical University, Shandong province, 256603 China

【机构】 滨州医学院护理学院

【摘要】 目的:探讨和分析不同类型护理本科生的评判性思维能力的现状,为护理教学改革提供基础资料。方法:使用CCTDI量表对护理本科生、该学院护理专升本、其他院校护理专升本学生233名进行问卷调查。结果:①本科生和专升本学生的评判性思维能力总分(243.37±25.50)及各子条目得分(30~40)偏低。②本科生的评判性思维的自信心得分较专升本学生得分高,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③其他院校专升本学生寻找真相得分较该学院专升本学生得分高,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:护理本科生评判性思维能力偏低。应合理配置护理专业课程,改进教学方法,加强师资评判性思维能力的培训以不断提高护理本科生的评判性思维能力。

【Abstract】 Objective: This study aimed to explore and analyze the critical thinking ofdifferent levels of undergraduate nursing students so as to provide basic data for nurs-ing education reform. Methods: 233 students, including full-time and part-time under-graduate students accepted CCTDI investigation. Results: ①Total score of criticalthinking for the undergraduate students was 243.37±25.50 and item score was 30~40,which showed a relatively low level. ②The score of self-confidence for full-time stu-dents was higher than that of part-time students, which showed a significant and statis-tic difference (P<0.05). ③The score of fact-searching of the part-time students in otherschool was higher than that in our school, which showed a significant and statisticdifference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The critical thinking ability of undergraduate studentswas lower. Nursing special curriculum should be established and education techniquesshould be improved. Additionally, training to the teachers on critical thinking was neces-sary for the improvement of the students’ critical thinking ability.

【关键词】 护理本科生评判性思维
【Key words】 undergraduate studentscritical thinking
【基金】 山东省教育厅重点资助项目子课题(A05017)
  • 【文献出处】 中国护理管理 ,Chinese Nursing Management , 编辑部邮箱 ,2008年09期
  • 【分类号】R47-4
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】341
节点文献中: