节点文献

不同混凝剂处理高藻水效果对比研究

Comparison of Different Coagulants in Treating High Algae-laden Source Water

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 何文杰李玉仙黄廷林

【Author】 He Wenjie~(1,2) Li Yuxian~1 Huang Tinglin~1 (1.School of Environ.and Munic.Eng.,Xi’an Univ.of Architec.and Tech.,Xi’an 710055,China; 2.Tianjin Water Works Co.Ltd.,Tianjin 300040,China)

【机构】 西安建筑科技大学西安建筑科技大学 陕西西安710055 天津自来水集团有限公司天津300040陕西西安710055

【摘要】 针对北方某水源有机物和藻类较高这一问题,进行了混凝、气浮,砂滤等常规工艺下FeCl3和高效聚合铝盐(HPAC)混凝剂对浊度、有机物和藻类去除效果对比试验。结果表明,低投量下的Fe盐混凝剂去除TOC的效果优于低投量的Al盐,但高投量下却相反;从除藻效果分析,两种混凝剂差别不大。考虑混凝剂价格时,相同混凝剂费用下二者投量比(分别以FeCl+3和Al2O3计)为FeCl3:HPAC=13:1,且在满足浊度出水水质情况下,最优Al盐费用少于Fe盐,但在以CODMn为控制指标时却相反。

【Abstract】 The problem existing in a northern city’s source water is high concentration of organic compounds,high turbidity and high algae concentration.A pilot scale test was conducted to compare the effects on removing turbidity, organic matters and algae by FeCl3 and HPAC.The results showed:HPAC had better performance on removing TOC than FeCl3 at low dosage,but this situation was reverse at high HPAC and FeCl3 dosage.No remarkable difference of algae removal was detected between FeCl3 and HPAC.Considering coagulant’s price,dosage ratio(FeCl3/HPAC)with the same coagulant’s dose fee was 13:1;when turbidity reached the standard of the effluent water quality,the optimal dosage fee of HPAC was less than FeC13;When CODMnof effluent was the controlling limit,the result was reverse.

【基金】 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2002AA601140);北京市水质科学与水环境恢复工程重点实验室开放课题;陕西省自然科学基金项目(2002E214)
  • 【文献出处】 净水技术 ,Water Purification Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年02期
  • 【分类号】TU991.22
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】543
节点文献中: