【摘要】 对照以赛亚.伯林的多元论思想可以发现:我国法理学界对中国法律正当性问题的论证大多局限于必要论证,而不成其为一种充分论证。这种片面性论证只说明了一种主张自身的合理之处或其它理论的不足之处,未能就自身主张相较于其它主张的优越性作出进一步比较分析,因此必定欠缺说服力。《中国法学向何处去》即为此种片面性论证之典型例子。更多还原

【Abstract】 We can see by contrasting with ideas of Berlin’s pluralism: In the field of the jurisprudence in our country, the demonstration of the justification for Chinese law is mostly confined to a necessary one, not a sufficient one. This demonstration with a insufficiency only formulates the reasonable opinions itself, or insufficient views of the other (others), not to compare the superior between them, so it lacks persuasion surely. “Whither the Science of Chinese law” is a type of this insufficiency of demonstration.更多还原