【摘要】 中国的公共服务市场化改革虽然取得了一些进展,但也出现了许多问题,尤其是医疗、教育和住房的高费用引发了公众的高度关注。因此,一些学者主张放弃市场化改革取向,强化政府的责任,重建公立机构在公共服务中的主导性,甚至恢复计划经济体制的种种制度安排。这种意见忽视了现代公共管理的一项基本经验,即政府完全可以以多种不同的角色参与或干预公共服务。放弃市场化和推崇市场化的意见虽然在方向上大相径庭,但是在混淆政府行动范围与政府能力强度上如出一辙。推进公共服务治理变革的可行之道,乃是缩小政府行动的范围但同时强化政府的制度能力,从而形成一个高效的“服务型政府”与一个生机勃勃的市场同时并存的双赢局面。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although achieving some progress,the market-oriented reforms of public services have brought about a lot of new problems.Particularly,the soaring of health care,education and housing prices has a- roused tremendous public concerns.It is popularized to propose that market reforms should be abandoned, and responsibilities should be re-enhanced.The reaffirmation of the dominance of public organizations in public service delivery or even restoring a variety of institutional arrangements imposed during the planned economy has been proposed.This proposal neglects a basic insight in public management,namely there are numerous roles that the government could play to participate or intervene into public services.While being contrast in orientation,the approaches against and for marketization share the failure of distinguishing be- tween the scope of government action and the strength of state capacity.A desirable way to bolster gov- ernance reform for public services is to limit the former while enhancing the latter.As a result,a win-win situation in which an effective“service-type government”could co-exist with a robust market.更多还原