【摘要】 清代今文家一致认为,孔子作《春秋》寓改制之意,此种观念不仅体现在他们的《春秋》学上,也体现在他们的《论语》解释上。从刘逢禄的《论语述何》、宋翔凤的《论语说义》,至戴望的《论语注》,都贯穿着此种共同的主题。不过,这些学者在解释的过程中有所差异,刘逢禄的解释着眼于“句”,宋翔凤的解释着眼于“篇”,而戴望的解释则从字开始,进而扩展到篇。总之,他们的企图都在建构一种可信的改制解释体系,不过,具体细节的差异却彰显出《论语》改制观的共同特征,即解释时都强调了思想的共通性引申,而忽略知识学的关联。这种解释特征,为晚清康有为的《论语》研究及其变法观念提供了考察的线索。更多还原

【Abstract】 The scholars who supported New Text in Qing dynasty identically considered that Confucius wrote Chunqiu to indicate the idea of the strypped-down.They emphasized this standpoint on their studies on Chunqiu,also on the explanations of The Analects.So the same subject ran through What The Analects Says of Liu Fenglu,The Content of The Analects of Song Xiangfeng and The note of The Analects of Dai Wang.There are some differences in the process of their explanations.Liu was with a view to ’sentence’,Song with an eye to ’piece’ and Dai started from ’word’ then extended to ’piece’.In conclusion,they wanted to construct a believable system of explaining the Strypped-down and the differences in the details displayed the common character,namely the scholars emphasized on amplifying on the common gender of the thoughts but ignored the knowledge relationships,of the Strypped-down in The Analects.That character also provided a review clue to the studies on The Analects and the conceptions about political reform of Kang Youwei.更多还原