节点文献

论行政处罚自由裁量的合理性

On reasonableness of administrative penalty discretion

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李盘生王汉耀陈丽洁陈亮何海玉

【Author】 LI Pan-sheng,WANG Han-yao,CHEN Li-jie,CHEN Liang,HE Hai-yu (LiShui Municipal Institute of Health Inspection , Zhenjiang Lishui 323000, China)

【机构】 丽水市卫生监督所丽水市卫生监督所 浙江丽水323000浙江丽水323000浙江丽水323000

【摘要】 为公正、公平地执行《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》 ,在诠释、分析了行政自由裁量权的涵义、现状 (问题 )及其原因的基础上 ,从 9个方面论述述如何把握行政处罚自由裁量的合理性。

【Abstract】 Nation administrative organs or the lawauthorized organizations exercise managing authority over relative people of administration in accordance with the law, implement administrative penalty to citizens, legal persons or organizations who violate the aduninistrative laws and regulations,so as to maintain the order of market economy, set up the essential means for a legal society. Administrative penalty must go on in accordance with the law. Administrative penalty law of PRC still stipulates clearly: “Administrative penalty must be imposed in adherence to the principles of fairness and openness." The principle of legality of administrative penalty can be seen clearly and intelligibly in a lot of relevant law and regulations and various kinds of administrative or judicial interpretations. However, embodiment of fairness and justice while emphasizing legality, namely the rationality principle of discretion is a question difficult to achieve in theory especially in practice discretion is not free in judging. On the basis of analyzing the meaning, current situation (question) and reason of the right of discretion from nine aspects, the authors discussed the question of how to hold the administrative right of discretion properly.

  • 【文献出处】 中国食品卫生杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene , 编辑部邮箱 ,2005年01期
  • 【分类号】D922.1
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】246
节点文献中: