【摘要】 作为当前水行政执法的热点工作,长江采砂执法中面临着较多难题。从行政执法和刑事责任等方面对其中的一些法律问题进行了探讨,对常见的一般偷采江砂的行为,认为《刑法》中最接近的罪名是非法采矿罪。非法开采长江江砂同一般的非法采矿又有不同,它不仅造成国有资源损失,还影响河势稳定,威胁防洪和水上交通安全,社会危害性更大;另外,其主管机关是水行政部门,而非地矿部门。同时,直接适用该罪名还有障碍,如刑法条文中"对矿产资源造成破坏"难以解释。建议最高人民法院对非法采砂专门出台司法解释,并明确当事人因偷采次数、数量和造成其他后果而承担刑事责任的具体界限。更多还原

【Abstract】 Enforcing laws and regulations on sand dredge in the Yangtze river faces many difficult problems. In terms of administratively enforcing laws and investigating responsibilities for crimes, some issues on laws are discussed, and the usual behavior of covert sand dredge in the Yangtze river is regarded as a criminal case similar to the illegal mining defined in the 《Criminal Law》. Illegal sand dredge in the Yangtze river not only causes losses in state-owned resources but also affects the stability of the river regime, poses a threat to the safety of the river dykes and to the river navigation, makes more damages to the society than that caused by illegal mining. In addition, the institutions responsible for the control and treatment of illegal sand dredge in rivers are administrative departments related to water, not geological and mining departments, so that it is not proper to directly accuse some people conducting illegal sand dredge of illegal mining. It is proposed that the Supreme People’s Court should make a jutical explanation of illegal sand dredge and stipulate the limit of responsibility for a crime of covert sand dredge in accordance with its times, volume and effect.更多还原