【摘要】 逻辑学界关于传统逻辑教科书中“概念”与“词项”的取舍问题一直存在分歧。从“概念”与“词项”内涵与外延的上 ,以及传统逻辑学的学科特征和研究方法来看 ,概念是思维的基本形式 ,属于哲学认识论的范畴 ,而词项是语词在命题中的逻辑内容 ,是构成逻辑形式的基本要素 ,属于逻辑学的范畴。传统逻辑教科书中用“词项”更准确。更多还原

【Abstract】 Making choice of“concept”and“terms”in the common logistic textbooks has been disputed in the logistic research. In this article we further compare“concept”and“terms”, combining the characters of common logic and the means of research on the basis of detailed analysis of the connotation and extension of“concept”and“terms”.Then we draw a conclusion that“concept”is basic form of thinking and falls into the category of philosophical epistemology, while“terms”is the logistic content of words in the proposition and the element composing logistic form, and it falls into the category of logic. It is reasonable using“terms”in the common logistic textbooks.更多还原