【摘要】 目的:分析脑卒中、脑外伤患者(病例组)和健康人(对照组)两组受试对象在平衡功能方面的差异,为临床康复提供依据。方法:病例组和对照组各为21例。对每一位受试者先给予一次平衡测试仪(balanceperformancemonitor,BPM)测试,BPM测试分别在睁眼及闭眼状态下各测试两次,取其均值分析。BPM测试后稍微休息再进行Berg平衡量表(Bergbalancescale,BBS)评定。结果:病例组BPM的重心分布、摆动轨迹长和摆动面积三个指标较对照组明显增大;BBS测试总分、静态总分和动态总分的得分与对照组比较均明显降低,且动态平衡功能的改变较静态平衡功能的改变更明显。两组之间BPM和BBS的各个测试指标均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:①BPM和BBS是评定平衡功能的理想工具,BBS较BPM的应用更为方便。②与同年龄组的健康人相比,脑卒中、脑外伤患者的平衡控制能力降低,尤以动态平衡功能减弱明显更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the difference on balance control between patients with brain injury(stroke and tramatic brain injury)and healthy subjects in order to guide clinical rehabilitation.Method:Twenty-one patients(case group)and21healthy subjects(control group)were included in the study.They were assessed with balance performance monitor(BPM)and then with Berg Balance Scale(BBS).Each subject performed the BPM twice with eyes-opened and eyes-closed respectively under the supervision of researcher.Result:Between the two groups there were significant differences on all of the indices of BPM and BBS(P<0.01).For case group the change of dynamic balance function was more obvious than that of static balance function.Conclusion:①BPM and BBS are good tools for assessing balance function and BBS is used more easily.②The patients with brain injury have obvious disorders on balance control,especially on dynamic balance.更多还原