【摘要】 在“曹评”史上 ,对曹禺戏剧定性为现实主义戏剧 ,这是一个时代的共识。该文作者对此定评提出质疑。并首次指出在中国风行了近百年的“现实主义” ,实际上同时指称着两个并存的名同而实不同的现实主义。作者详述了这两个具有对立原则的现实主义的历史由来、各自的实质特征 ,其中 ,重点放在对我国特有的现实主义的阐发上 ,指出她对中国传统“士”文化精神的一脉传承。在这一辨析的基础之上 ,该文作者认为 ,曹禺戏剧既不是中国特有的现实主义 ,也不是西方意义上的现实主义。更多还原

【Abstract】 During the history of Cao Yu’s Criticize, Cao Yu’s pla ys were regarded as readistic works and this view was widely received in a whole time. The author raised her doubts about this view and in the first time pointe d out that the Realism which had been popular for more than one hundred years in China in fact meant two paralling but defferent realism. The author discussed t heir own sources and essential features in details and payed her attention to th e interpretation of Chinese particular realism. She pointed out that this partic ular realism inherited Chinese traditional literati culture. On the basis of thi s analysis the author concluded that Cao Yu’s plays were distinguished from the other Chinese particular realistic and western realistic plays.更多还原