节点文献

论清末教育的发展、腐败与落后

On the Development, Corruption and Backwardness of Education in Late Qing Dynasty

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 秦学智

【Author】 QIN Xuezhi(Educational College of Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

【机构】 北京师范大学教育学院 北京100875

【摘要】 清末教育有发展、有腐败、也有落后。教育腐败论者不能很好地把教育腐败与教育发展和教育落后区分开来。教育腐败论产生的缘由是对政治、经济与教育的关系,生产力、生产关系与教育的关系及经济基础与上层建筑的关系等问题认识不清。"教育腐败"充其量只是教育生产关系上的腐败或说非正常化。"教育落后"可能是教育腐败引起的,但"教育落后"并不等同于"教育腐败"。要坚信"教育在发展"理论的正确性,对祖国的未来和未来的教育满怀信心。

【Abstract】 Education in late Qing Dynasty is of development, corruption and backwardness. Those who advocate for the point that education in late Qing Dynasty is corrupt can’t tell clearly educational corruption from its development and backwardness. The reason for the opinion that it is corrupt form is that there is no clear knowledge of the relation between politics, economics and education, between productive forces, productive relation and education, between economic base and superstructure etc. Educational corruption is corruption of education in productive relation at most. Educational backwardness may be caused by educational corruption, but they are not equal. We should hold strong belief in the correction of the theory of developing education and the future of our motherland as well as its education.

  • 【文献出处】 华北水利水电学院学报(社科版) ,Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power , 编辑部邮箱 ,2003年02期
  • 【分类号】G529
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】314
节点文献中: