【摘要】 语文课程的本质属性是“人文性” ,这是对“工具论”的有力反驳。但它立论于语文即语言、语文教育即语言教育 ,出现了与“工具性”并列合一的尴尬。及至立论于言语和言语教育 ,“人文说”获得了“课程论”的意义。“对话”理论的引入 ,更使“人文论”的论证中肯而深刻更多还原

【Abstract】 The essential property of a course in Chinese is that it has the nature of the humanities ,which is a strong refutation against the view of its being a sort of tool. But the viewpoint mentioned above is set forth on language, Chinese education and language education. As a result, there arises the embarrassment of its combination with its nature of being a tool. When it is set forth on speech and its education, because of its nature of the humanties Chinese is regarded as an independent course. With the introduction of the theory of discourse, the proof of its nature of the humanities is profound and reasonable.更多还原