【摘要】 【目的】比较非脱垂子宫经阴道切除术与腹式子宫切除术的手术效果。【方法】分析 2 82例非脱垂子宫的改良阴式切除术和 2 5 0例同期指征相近的腹式子宫切除术的手术时间、术中出血量、术后体温、肛门排气时间、术后病人下床活动时间、住院天数及术后 3个月随访情况进行比较。【结果】改良阴式子宫切除术组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后体温、术后排气时间、下床活动时间及住院天数均少于腹式子宫切除术组 (P <0 .0 1) ,术后 3个月随访阴道残端愈合、下腹部疼痛等 (P >0 .0 5 )。【结论】改良阴式子宫切除术 ,术后患者的恢复明显优于腹式子宫切除术更多还原

【Abstract】 For the sake of comparing the postoperative effect between the improved vaginal hysterectomy and panhysterectomy without metroptosising. To review and make a comparative analysis 282 cases of improved vaginal hysterectomy and 250 cases of panhysterectomy, which have the similar target at the same term, in the respect of operation time, bleeding, postoperative temperature, postoperative fart, the first time to move about, hospitalized time, and the patient’s position after 3 months. The operation time, bleeding, postoperative temperature, postoperative fart, the first time to move about, and the hospitalized time in the improved vaginal hysterectomy cases, was less than the panhysterectomy cases respectively (P<0 01), but the remnant vagina, hypogastrium pain after 3 months were out of notable difference(P>0 05). [Conclusion] The improved vaginal hysterectomy can make the postoperative patient recovered better than the hysterectomy distinctly.更多还原