节点文献

试论民事证明责任的法律性质

On the nature of burden of proof

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 奚玮张韬

【Author】 XI Wei (Institute of Economics ,Law and Politics,ANU,Wuhu ,Anhui 241000,China)

【机构】 安徽师范大学经济法政学院安徽师范大学人事处 安徽 芜湖 241000安徽 芜湖 241000

【摘要】 提供证据责任与证明责任有着本质上的差异,将二者罗列在一个“举证责任”概念之下,并从提供证据的立场把握证明责任的法律性质是难以解决问题的。考察举证责任制度的历史沿革,可以看出两大法系的举证责任理论都承认在举证责任的不同解释中证明责任为其本质,证明责任的法律性质应为负担,是当案件事实于最后仍真伪不明时,一方当事人所承担的不利后果。

【Abstract】 There is an essential distinction between the burden of producing evidence and the burden of proof.It is difficult to solve the problem while considering them as one concept as well as seeing through the nature of burden of proof from the stand of producing evidence.From inspecting the history of producing evidence system,we can find that the burden of proof is essence in the theory of producing evidence both in crimal law and civil law.The nature of burden of proof is burden and disadvantages which are taken by one litigant while the case can not be tried at last.

【关键词】 提供证据责任证明责任负担
【Key words】 burden of producing evidenceburden of proofburden
  • 【文献出处】 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版) ,Journal of Anhui Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2001年04期
  • 【分类号】D925.1
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】283
节点文献中: