节点文献

《国家体育锻炼标准》中跳类项目评分标准差异性的分析

Analysis on the difference of the grading standards for the jump categories in the National Physical Training Standard

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱雅敏;

【Author】 ZHU Ya?min (Zhejiang Wanli college,Ningbo 315101,China)

【机构】 浙江万里学院体育教学部!浙江宁波315101;

【摘要】 通过数年对女生跳高、跳远和立定跳远成绩的随机抽样 ,运用统计学的原理进行分析研究 ,发现同属跳类项目的立定跳远的评分标准与跳高、跳远存在着极显著的差异。建议对项目设置及评分标准进行有效性和客观性验证。

【Abstract】 Applying the principles of statistics to analyzing the results based on years of random sampling of the women’s records in high jump,long jump,and standing long jump,l have discovered that there is marked discrepancy between the grading standards for high jump and long jump,and standing long jump,although they belong to the same jump categories.l suggest that the setting?up of the categories and their grading standards be tested and verified in the aspects of effectiveness and objectivity.

【关键词】 跳类项目; 评分标准; 差异性;
【Key words】 jump; categories; grading standards; difference;
  • 【文献出处】 浙江体育科学 ,ZHEJIANG SPORTS SCIENCE , 编辑部邮箱 ,2000年03期
  • 【分类号】G811.37
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】33
节点文献中: