节点文献

慢性病毒性肝炎临床分型与病理分型的对比分析

Contrast analysis of clinical typing and pathological typing of chronic virus hepatitis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 许德军王国玉赵根成李文田芳李芳郝爱琴

【Author】 Xu Dejun,Wang Guoyu, Zhao Gencheng, et al. Anyang 5th Hospital,Henan Province,455000

【机构】 河南省安阳市第五人民医院

【摘要】 目的探讨慢性病毒性肝炎临床分型与病理分型的关系。方法按照“95方案”就我院1993~1998年5月经肝穿活检病理确诊的546例慢性病毒性肝炎患者,将其临床分型与病理分型及分型诊断标准进行了对比分析。结果本组资料表明按“95方案”慢性肝炎临床诊断与病理诊断总符合率为8278%,轻度、重度与病理符合率分别为9354%、9444%;中度慢性肝炎符合率仅40%。慢性肝炎中度与重度SB、A的比较无统计学意义(P均>005),而PTA的比较两组有显著性差异(P<001),PTA是判断慢性肝炎病轻重的敏感而可靠的指标。结论“95方案”比较科学和客观的反映了慢性肝炎的临床诊断标准,但部分诊断标准有待进一步探讨。

【Abstract】 Aim To study the relationship between clinical typing and pathological typing of chronic virus hepatitis. Method According to scheme 95,546 cases of chronic virus hepatitis were comparatively analyzed between clinical typing and pathological typing, all cases were diagnosed by liver needle biopsy in our hospital from 1993 to May,1998. Result according to scheme 95,the coincidental rate between clinical diagnosis and pathological diagnosis of chronic hepatitis is 82.78%.The coincidental rate of mild hepatitis is 93.54%,severe hepatitis is 94.44%,and moderate hepatitis is only 40%.The SBA between moderate hepatitis and severe hepatitis is no statistical significance(P>0.05),but PTA between moderate and severe hepatitis is significantly difference(P<0.01).PTA is sensitive and reliable to decide the severity of chronic hepatitis. Conclusion the clinical diagnosis criteria in scheme 95 is scientific and objective,but some diagnosis criteria can be further discussed.

【关键词】 慢性肝炎分型临床病理
【Key words】 hronic hepatitistypingclinicpathology
  • 【文献出处】 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志 ,CHINESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY , 编辑部邮箱 ,1999年02期
  • 【分类号】R512.602
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】43
节点文献中: