节点文献

慢性肾脏疾病中LDL-C两种测定方法的比较

Comparison of two LDL-C Detecting Methods in Chronic Renal Diseases

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 范瑾瑾; 高玲; 黄恩芳; 俞纯山;

【Author】 FAN Jin-Jin; GAO Lin; HUANG En-Fang; YU Chun-Shan(Department of Clincical Laboratory,The First Affiliated Hospitalof Sun Yat-san University of Medical Sciences Guangzhou 510080)

【机构】 中山医科大学附属第一医院医学检验部!广州; 510080;

【摘要】 目的:比较正常人及慢性肾脏疾病病人血清中两种测定LDL-C浓度方法的差异。方法:间接计算法利用Fredewald公式计算LDL-C的浓度,直接测定法即匀相分析法直接测得LDL-C浓度。结果:42例正常对照组两种方法测定结果无显著性差异(P>0.1),r=0.9794,表明正常人群中两种方法有良好的相关性。在37例慢性肾衰竭(CRF)的病人及25例肾综病人中,两种方法所得结果有显著性差异(P<0.05),其中在CRF组中,r=0.9314,而在肾综组中r=0.8732,相关性均有所下降。结论:在慢性肾脏疾病中直接法测定LDL-C浓度由于不依赖其他脂质成分,是一个较间接计算法更为准确的方法。

【Abstract】 Objective: To compare two LDL-C measuring methods: uniforrnity medium assay and Fredewald formula calculating method. Methods Two different methods were both used to determme the serum LDL-C concentration in three differrent groups: normal control group (n = 42), nephrotic syndrome (NS) (n = 25 ) and chronic renal failure (CRF) (n = 37). Result Two methods showed no significant difference(P>0. 1) and a good correlation (r = 0. 979 4) in the control group. In the NS group and CRF group,there was a significant difference (P<0. 05) between the two methods and the correlation was lower (r = 0. 873 2 in NS, r = 0. 931 4 in CRF group). Conclusion The direct method appeared to be more accurate for detecting of LDL-C because it is not depended on other lipids components.

  • 【文献出处】 陕西医学检验 ,SHAAXI JOURNAL OF MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES , 编辑部邮箱 ,1999年04期
  • 【分类号】R446.1
  • 【下载频次】25
节点文献中: