节点文献

亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢他啶治疗中、重度细菌感染疗效费用分析比较研究

Cost effectiveness analysis of imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of moderate and severe bacterial infection

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 曲晓华李真戴丽

【Author】 Qu Xiaohua, Li Zhen and Dai Li (Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035)

【机构】 北京积水潭医院

【摘要】 对我院45例确诊为中、重度细菌感染住院患者进行了亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢他啶疗效费用分析比较研究。结果表明:2组病例有效率、死亡率无显著性差异;头孢他啶组较亚胺培南/西司他丁组疗程明显延长。亚胺培南/西司他丁每日所需费用明显高于头孢他啶;治疗结束时,前者全部费用并未超过后者;全部住院费用无明显差异。作者认为:决定2种药物全部费用的因素,除与药物单价和每日费用有关,还与药物疗程密切相关。选用药物抗菌作用越强,用药时间即相应缩短,住院时间必然缩短;最终患者住院费用降低

【Abstract】 Cost effectiveness analysis of imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftazidime in treatment of 45 hospicalized patients with moderate and severe bacterial infection was assessed. There is no difference in clinical efficacy and mortality rate between two groups. Ceftazidime group is longer than imipenem/cilastatin group in course of treatment. Daily cost of antibiotic in imipenem/cilastatin group exceeds that in ceftazidime group. Total cost of imipenem/cilastatin group corresponds to that of ceftazidime group.

  • 【文献出处】 中国抗生素杂志 ,CHINESE JOURNAL OF NATIBIOTICS , 编辑部邮箱 ,1997年04期
  • 【分类号】R978.12
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】58
节点文献中: