节点文献

对几种身体成分测试方法的评估

Assessment of Different Evaluation Methods for Body Composition

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 隆璐娟杨锡让王晓英乔志源

【Author】 Long Lu-juan, etc.(Beijing P. E University, Beijing , China 100081)

【机构】 北京体育大学

【摘要】 以水下称重法为准,对皮皱法、围度和电阻抗3种简易方法进行验证,于1992年夏季对男29人、女40人,平均年龄ll岁小学生进行了测试。通过测试比较,发现皮皱法与水下称重法的相关男女分别为0.7和0.6.电阻抗法和围度法测定身体成分的准确性较差,这一结果有待于进一步做大面积的测试研究。

【Abstract】 n this artical we take hydrostatic-weighing method as standard method to assess the accuracy ofskinfold; circumferences aiid electric impedance. The subjects were elementary school students (male29 ; femal 40;averege ase 1 1 ).The findings showed that the coreletion coefficient of hydrostatic weighing with skinfold were 0. 7 and 0. 6 in male and female respectively. The accuracy of electricimpedance and circumference was comparetively poor , this result should be cofirmed in large scale studies.

  • 【文献出处】 山东体育学院学报 ,JOURNAL OF SHANDONG PHYSICAL EDUCATION INSTITUTE , 编辑部邮箱 ,1994年04期
  • 【分类号】G804.49
  • 【被引频次】42
  • 【下载频次】446
节点文献中: