【摘要】 目的:对DiaSys（R/S 2003）尿沉渣定量分析工作站法、Fast Read₁₀₂定量尿沉渣计数板法、改良牛鲍氏血细胞计数池法和UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪四种尿沉渣检测方法进行比较和评价。方法:尿液标本经标准化方法处理后,分别用上述四种方法进行定量计数分析,并比较结果。结果:四种方法重复性均较好;以Fast Read₁₀₂定量尿沉渣计数板法为标准,仅UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪法有显著性差异,P<0.05;且UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪法的参考范围也与其余3组不同。结论:UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪对于尿沉渣检测的筛检具有重要价值,但并不能完全替代显微镜检查。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:We comparison and evaluation four methods of urinary sediment,there are DiaSys（R/S 2003）urinary sediment quantitative analysis workstation,Fast Read₁₀₂ urinary sediment quantitative counting plate,improved blood cell counting chamber,UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer.Methods:Treated the urine sample with standard operation process, quantitative analyzed the sample with four methods as above,then compared the result and evaluated those methods. Results:we got good reproducibility with each method,compared to the result of Read₁₀₂ urinary sediment quantitative counting plate,only that of UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer had difference significantly,P<0.05;and the reference range existed signifi- cant difference too,compared with others methods.Conclusion:UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer had important role in the scanning test of urinary sediment,but it can not replace the manual microscopy inspection.更多还原