【摘要】 目的探讨Boomerang血管封堵器在经皮冠状动脉造影(CAG)及介入治疗(PCI)中应用的有效性和安全性。方法将206例行CAG及PCI的患者随机分为普通肝素组和低分子肝素组,比较两组患者使用血管封堵器的成功率、止血时间、指压时间、留置时间、局部并发症发生率及术后卧床时间。结果普通肝素组和低分子肝素组的成功率均较高(98.06%和99.03.%),差异无统计学意义。普通肝素组和低分子肝素组各发生局部血肿1例,并发症发生率差异两组间无统计学意义。止血时间、留置时间、指压时间及卧床时间两组间差异无统计学意义。结论CAG及PCI术后,在术中应用普通肝素或低分子肝素对Boomerang血管封堵器的应用无明显影响,Boomerang血管封堵器均能安全有效止血。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To assess the clinical safety and effectiveness of Boomerang closure device (Boomerang Percutaneous Femoral Access Management System) applied to patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods206 patients undergoing CAG and/or PCI were randomly divided into the heparin group and low molecular heparin (LWMH) group. The hemostasia success rate, hemostasia time, manual pressure time, device dwell time, complication rate and time to ambulation with each other of two groups were compared.ResultsThe heparin group and LWMH group both had high hemostasia success rate (98.06% and 99.03%), there wasn’t significant difference between two groups. There was one patient with hematoma formation in the heparin group and LWMH group respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups in hemostasia time, manual pressure time, the device dwell time and time to ambulation.ConclusionAfter CAG and/or PCI, administered heparin and low molecular heparin is no effect on Boomerang closure device, and Boomerang closure device has a high hemostasia success rate.更多还原