【摘要】 目前,学界将“舆论审判”与“媒体审判”分别加以讨论并无必要,从舆论学和法理学的视角看,二者没有根本性的差别。“媒体审判”背后实际上是两种理念的冲突:表达自由与司法独立。在中国现实语境中,这两种价值都有保护的必要,因此应当采取有效手段对表达自由和司法独立之间的紧张关系进行平衡,从而建构司法和传媒间的和谐关系。更多还原

【Abstract】 It is unnecessary for scholars today to differentiate between "opinion judgment" and "media judgment" and discuss them accordingly.From the point of view of consensus study and jurisprudence,there are not fundamental distinctions between them.There behind the "media judgment" is the conflict of two different ideas: liberty of speech and independence of judicature.In China,these two values deserve to be protected,so effective methods should be adopted to ease the tension between liberty of speech and independence of judicature,and thereby a harmonious relationship between judicature and media will be built.更多还原