节点文献

生命质量8条简明量表中文版开发及其性能评价

DEVLOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF CHINESE VERSION OF SHORT FORM 8

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王珊栾荣生雷燕旷翠萍何成普陈云

【Author】 WANG Shan,LUAN Rong-sheng,LEI Yan,et al.(Department of Epidemiology,West China School of Public Health,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)

【机构】 四川大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室四川省成都市成华区疾控中心四川省成都市青羊区疾控中心 成都610041成都

【摘要】 [目的]开发用于测量生命质量的8条目简明量表(SF-8)中文版本,并检验其信度和效度。[方法]采用翻译与回译两个步骤开发SF-8中文版本;采用现况调查用SF-8中文版本测量部分成都市居民生命质量,计算量表的内部一致性信度,并以SF-36为校标计算SF-8量表的校标效度,运用因子分析评价其结构效度。[结果]SF-8量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.749;SF-8量表测量结果与SF-36的总分相关系数为0.559,各维度相关系数范围在0.339~0.539之间;因子分析共提取出3个公因子,即心理健康、生理健康和总体健康,累计贡献率为71.71%。[结论]SF-8量表具有较好的信度和效度,可以在中国人群中应用。但在应用时也要注意调查对结果灵敏度的要求。

【Abstract】 [Objective]To develop the Chinese version of Short Form 8(SF-8)and test the reliability and validity.[Methods]The Chinese version of SF-8 was developed by translation and back translation.Chinese version of SF-8 was used to measure Chengdu citizen’ quality of life in a cross-sectional study.Cronbach’ α coefficient was calculated to evaluate the internal consistency;criterion validity was calculated with SF-36 as criterion;factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity.[Results]Cronbach’ α coefficient of SF-8 was 0.749;correlation coefficient between SF-8 and SF-36 was 0.559;the 3 factors mental health,physical health and integrated health,were sorted,which accounted for 71.71% of the scale’s total variances.[Conclusions]The study suggests that the SF-8 has satisfactory reliability and validity,and it can be used in Chinese population.But we should pay attention to the requirement for sensitivity of the survey,when we select SF-8 to measure the quality of life.

【关键词】 生命质量SF-8信度效度
【Key words】 Quality of lifeSF-8ReliabilityValidity
  • 【文献出处】 现代预防医学 ,Modern Preventive Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年06期
  • 【分类号】R195
  • 【被引频次】63
  • 【下载频次】977
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络