节点文献

蛋白芯片法与金标法及抗酸染色法诊断结核病的比较

Comparison of Three Methods for Rapid Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 罗招凡; 林向华; 李竞;

【Author】 LUO Zhao-fan,LIN Xiang-hua,LI Jing(Department of Laboratory Science,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangdong Guangzhou 510120,China)

【机构】 中山大学附属第二医院检验科; 中山大学附属第二医院检验科 广东广州510120; 广东广州510120;

【摘要】 目的将诊断结核病的蛋白芯片法与金标法及抗酸染色法进行比较,以评价蛋白芯片的临床应用价值。方法用蛋白芯片法、金标法及抗酸染色法检测75例确诊结核病人、30例肺部其它疾病患者和健康体检者的血清标本,并进行相关统计分析。结果蛋白芯片法、金标法及抗酸染色法检出结核分枝杆菌的灵敏度为64%,72%及22.7%,前两者比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),但均高于抗酸染色法(P<0.05)。三者的特异性分别为90%,76.7%及96.7%。结论蛋白芯片法检测结核分枝杆菌,与金标法及抗酸染色法比较,具有简便、快速、敏感性较高和特异性强等优点,是临床辅助诊断结核病的有效方法。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare with TB protein-chip(PC),dot-immuogold filtration assay(DIGFA) and acid-fast bacilli smear(AFS) for rapid diagnosis of Tuberculosis(TB),and to evaluate the clinical application value of TB protein-chip.Methods 75 serum samples of TB patients,30 non-TB lung diseases patients and healthy control people were detected by TB PC,DIGFA and AFS simultaneously,and the χ2-test was performed.Results The sensitivity of the TB PC,DIGFA and AFS were 64%,72% and 22.7%,respectively.There were no significant difference between the TB PC and DIGFA(P>0.05),which was higher than that of AFS(P<0.05),while the specificity of the three methods were 90%,76.7% and 96.7%,respectively.Conclusion Compared with DIGFA and AFS,the TB protein-chip is simple,rapid,sensitive and specific for detection multiple TB antibodies,which would be taken as a helpful method for early and rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis.

【关键词】 蛋白芯片; 结核分枝杆菌; 诊断;
【Key words】 protein-chip; tuberculous mycobacterium; diagnosis;
  • 【文献出处】 现代检验医学杂志 ,Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年02期
  • 【分类号】R52
  • 【被引频次】8
  • 【下载频次】136
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络