节点文献

米根霉发酵液中乳酸含量的测定方法研究

Studies on Analytical Methods of Lactic Acid Content in Fermentation Broth

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 樊永红王丽柳丹李文杨英歌郑之明余增亮

【Author】 FAN Yong-hong,WANG Li,LIU Dan,LI Wen,YANG Ying-ge,ZHEN Zhi-ming,YU Zeng-liang*(Key Laboratory of Ion Beam Bioengineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hefei 230031,China)

【机构】 中国科学院离子束生物工程重点实验室中国科学院离子束生物工程重点实验室 安徽合肥230031安徽合肥230031

【摘要】 目的:为了找到方便、准确、快捷的米根霉RL6041菌株发酵液中乳酸含量的检测方法。方法:同时采用EDTA定钙法、高效液相色谱(HPLC)法和生物传感仪法三种方法测定米根霉RL6041菌株发酵液中的乳酸含量。结果:米根霉RL6041菌株三批次发酵的测试结果的差异显著性分析表明,在同一发酵批次的乳酸含量测试中,EDTA定钙法与HPLC法、生物传感仪法有显著差异(p<0.05),而HPLC法与生物传感仪法无显著性差异(p>0.05)。EDTA定钙法平均误差7.50g/L;而HPLC法和生物传感仪测定法的平均误差分别为2.84g/L和2.39g/L。结论:EDTA定钙法简便快速,但重复性差;HPLC法准确、灵敏;生物传感仪测定法比较准确和方便。

【Abstract】 Objective:In order to find more convenient,veracious and fast methods that were used to measure the lactic acid content in fermentation broth of Rhizopus oryzae RL6041.Methods:The EDTA titration,HPLC(High Performance Liquid Chromatography)and bio-sensor methods were contrasted in this study.Results:The results of three batches showed that the EDTA titration had significant differences(p<0.05)comparing with HPLC and bio-sensor methods,while there were no significant differences(p<0.05)between HPLC and bio-sensor methods in the same batch.an average error of the EDTA titration method was 7.50 g/L,however,that of the HPLC and bio-sensor methods was respective 2.84 g/L and 2.39 g/L.Conclusion:The EDTA titration method was simple and rapid,however,it had poor reproducibility;The HPLC method was accurate and sensitive;The bio-sensor methods had good specificity and convenient.

  • 【分类号】TQ920
  • 【被引频次】27
  • 【下载频次】1196
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络