节点文献

用擂台赛法则构造多目标Pareto最优解集的方法

An Approach of Constructing Multi-Objective Pareto Optimal Solutions Using Arena’s Principle

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郑金华; 蒋浩; 邝达; 史忠植;

【Author】 ZHENG Jin-Hua1, JIANG Hao1, KUANG Da1, SHI Zhong-Zhi2 1(Institute of Information Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China) 2(Institute of Computing Technology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China)

【机构】 湘潭大学信息工程学院; 中国科学院计算技术研究所 湖南湘潭411105; 湖南湘潭411105; 北京100080;

【摘要】 针对多目标进化的特点,提出了用擂台赛法则(arena’s principle,简称AP)构造多目标Pareto最优解集的方法,论证了构造方法的正确性,分析了其时间复杂度为O(rmN)(0<m/N<1).理论上,当AP与Deb的算法以及Jensen的算法比较时(它们的时间复杂度分别为O(rN2)和O(Nlog(r-1)N)),AP优于Deb的算法;当目标数r较大时(如r≥5),AP优于Jensen的算法;此外,当m/N较小时(如m/N≤50%),AP的效率与其他两种算法比较具有优势.对比实验结果表明,AP具有比其他两种算法更好的CPU时间效率.在应用中,AP可以被集成到任何基于Pareto的MOEA中,并能在较大程度上提高MOEA的运行效率.

【Abstract】 This paper proposes an approach, namely the arena’s principle (AP), to construct the Pareto optimal solutions by utilizing features of the multi-objective evolution. It is proved that the AP works correctly and its computational complexity is O(rmN) (0<m/N<1). Theoretically, when AP is compared with Deb’s algorithm and Jensen’s algorithm (their computational complexity are O(rN2) and O(Nlog(r?1)N) respectively), AP is better than Deb’s, and is also better than Jensen’s when the objective number r is relatively large (such as r≥5). Moreover, AP performs better than the other two algorithms when m/N is relatively small (such as m/N≤50%). Experimental results indicate that AP performs better than the other two algorithms on the CPU time efficiency. In applications, AP can be integrated into any Pareto-based MOEA to improve its running efficiency.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金Nos.60435010,69974043;教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金;湖南省自然科学基金Nos.01JJY2060,05JJ30125;湖南省教育厅重点科研项目~~
  • 【文献出处】 软件学报 ,Journal of Software , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年06期
  • 【分类号】TP301.6
  • 【被引频次】123
  • 【下载频次】837
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络