节点文献

斑点金免疫渗滤法在布鲁氏菌病监测地区的现场应用

Field application of dot immunogold filtration assay in brucellosis surveillance area

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱明东徐卫民洪林娣王衡

【Author】 ZHU Ming-dong, XU Wei-min, HONG lin-di, WANG Heng. Department of Epidemiology, Iinstitute of Parasitic Diseases, Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences. Zhejiang 310013, China

【机构】 浙江省医学科学院寄生虫病研究所流行病室浙江省布病防治中心浙江省布病防治中心 浙江杭州310013浙江杭州310013

【摘要】 目的验证斑点金免疫渗滤法(DIGFA)在布鲁氏菌病监测地区的现场应用效果。方法选择布鲁氏菌病监测地区重点人群和不同职业人群,采用DIGFA和试管凝集试验(SAT)检测布鲁氏菌病抗体。结果重点人群两种方法检测抗体阳性符合率为96.66%,阴性符合率为99.92%;不同职业人群两种方法检测阳性符合率为96.36%,阴性符合率为99.92%,两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论DIGFA与SAT同样具有敏感性强,特异性高等优点;此外,DIGFA还具有操作简便,快速,微量等优点,适合于布鲁氏菌病监测地区的现场应用。

【Abstract】 Objective This study was disigned to evaluate the field application effect of dot immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA) in brucellosis surveillance area. Methods The brucellosis antibody was detected by both DIGFA and serum agglutination test (SAT) among specific crowds and those of different occupation in the surveillance area. Results The positive antibody coincidence was 96.66%, negative coincidence 99.92% on detecting sera of specific persons by both the two methods, while the positive antibody coincidence was 96.36% and negative coincidence 99.92% among crowds of different occupation by both methods. There is no significant between DIGFA and SAT(P>0.05)on detecting sera of specific crowds and those of different occupation. Conclusion DIGFA and SAT are both sensitive and specific. Additionally, DIGFA is rapid, simple to operate, and capable of trace detection, and thus the proper approach to be applied in brucellosis surveillance area.

【基金】 浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金资助(2004A004)
  • 【文献出处】 疾病监测 ,Disease Surveillance , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年04期
  • 【分类号】R516.7
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】48
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络