节点文献

正反两依依——谈“论‘反规划’”

Negative and Positive-Reluctant to Leave Each Other——On “On ’Anti-planning’”

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 叶小群

【Author】 Ye Xiaoqun

【机构】 安徽建筑工业学院建筑系

【摘要】 评价传统物质性规划的功效不能仅限于用地布局细节的实现和规模预测的准确,重要的是考量对城市的生长方向和整体格局,以及各主要功能区的框架,交通系统网络的构建,城市基础设施的统筹与民生质量的改善等方面的指导和控制作用。“反规划”是一逆向的思维,是对“正规划”的一种校正,虽不是综合性、系统性方法论的思路,但可作为规划研究手段应用于城市发展方向、城市形态、用地评价和选择方面。

【Abstract】 The evaluation of the efficacy of the traditional material planning should not be confined only to the extent of realization of the details in land utilization and the accuracy of the scope forecast. The most important thing is to consider the guidance and control over such aspects as direction of urban growth and overall arrangement, the framework of each functional area, the construction of the traffic system and network, the integration of the urban infrastructure and the improvement of the quality of the people’s livelihood, etc.. Anti-planning is a kind of retrorse thinking and a correction of the conventional planning instead of a comprehensive or systematic methodological way of thinking. It can be considered as a means for planning study which can play a role in urban development direction, urban configuration, land use evaluation and choice, etc.

【基金】 安徽建筑工业学院精品课程建设(ZDKC200405);教学研究项目(2004JX15)资助
  • 【分类号】TU981
  • 【被引频次】28
  • 【下载频次】899
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络