节点文献

民营化为何不能改善公司经营绩效——国光瓷业民营化的案例研究

Why Cann’t Private Ownership Improve Corporation Performance: Case Study on Privatizing Guoguang Ceramic

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 朱红军王彬田子莘

【Author】 ZHU Hong-jun1, WANG Bin2, TIAN Zi-shen2(1. Accounting and Financing Institute, Shanghai University of Finance & Economics, Shanghai 200433, China; 2. Accounting School, Shanghai University of Finance & Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

【机构】 上海财经大学会计与财务研究院上海财经大学会计学院上海财经大学会计学院 上海200433上海200433

【摘要】 本文以国光瓷业民营化为例,研究发现公司业绩并没有在“国退民进”之后表现出极大改善,相反正在急剧恶化。我们运用产权理论详细分析了民营化前后的所有权安排,指出民营化后的所有权安排并没有显著改善。基于这种所有权安排的控制权收益是导致公司业绩恶化的直接原因,“国有”时期的控制权收益体现在上市公司为政府的多元化经营目标服务,偏离了企业以盈利为导向的经营目标,而“民营”时期的控制权收益则体现为民营股东从上市公司转移资源。因此,通过完善证券市场的基础法律环境,约束甚至严惩控股股东获取控制权收益,是保证国有上市公司“国退民进”取得成功的基础。

【Abstract】 This paper is a case study based on privatizing Guoguang Ceramic. It is found that the corporation performance had been deteriorating, not improving as some scholars thought. We analyze ownership arrangements before and after it was privatized and find that private ownership arrangements still have deficiencies and not better than state ownership arrangements. Existence of private benefits of control is the essential reason why the performance had been deteriorating. Private benefits of control with state ownership come from government’s multiple objects of controlled corporation, the benefits with private ownership lie on resources transferred from the corporation. To succeed in privatizing SOEs, it is essential that law circumstance be perfected with which private benefits of control are put down.

【基金】 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“转轨经济中的公司治理与控制权收益”(批准号2006JDXM161)。
  • 【文献出处】 中国工业经济 ,China Industrial Economy , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年01期
  • 【分类号】F426.71
  • 【被引频次】31
  • 【下载频次】1359
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络