节点文献

GPS与形变仪器观测固体潮方法的初步比较

PRIMARY COMPARISON OF TIDE MEASURING METHOD BETWEEN WITH GPS AND WITH DEFORMATION INSTRUMENT

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴培稚徐平邢成起尹继尧赵桂儒樊智勇袁学明

【Author】 Wu Peizhi1),Xu Ping1,2),Xing Chengqi1),Yin Jiyao3,4),Zhao Guiru3),Fan Zhiyong1) and Yuan Xueming1) 1)Earthquake Administration of Beijing, Beijing 100080 2)Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029 3)Institute of Earthquake Prediction, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036 4)Earthquake Administration of Shanghai, Shanghai 200062

【机构】 北京市地震局中国地震局地震预测预报研究所北京市地震局 北京100080北京100080中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所北京100029北京100036上海市地震局上海200062

【摘要】 由于GPS观测方法在有源性、点观测、数据成分、数据剔除、数据预处理、比较基准、基础数据的惟一性等方面,与伸缩仪、水平摆倾斜仪等形变观测方法存在相当大的差异,为了了解GPS测量的特性,选择固体潮为观测对象,比较了GPS与伸缩仪等形变观测仪的异同。从延庆、东三旗、十三陵等台相关设备实测结果来看,GPS观测到的固体潮在形态上与理论值和伸缩仪等设备观测结果十分相似,但幅度要大得多,垂直分量最大日幅差接近100mm。

【Abstract】 As the GPS method is different from deformation measuring methods with extensometer and horizontal pendulum tiltmeter at the aspect of having source, point observation, data composition, data deleting, data preprocessing, comparing datum,the sole basic data and so on. In order to understand the particularity of GPS survey, taking earth tide as the surveying object, GPS is compared with the convention deformation measuring methods here. The results at YANQ, DSQI, BJSH and other stations show that the earth tide surveyed by GPS is similar to the theoretical value and the data observeed by conventional deformation measuring instruments such as extensometer, but the amplitude of GPS result is bigger than others, as the max amplitude difference in one day of vertical-component can achieve 100 mm.

【基金】 北京市自然科学基金项目(8041001);北京市科技攻关项目(H030630090190)
  • 【文献出处】 大地测量与地球动力学 ,Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年01期
  • 【分类号】P228.4
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】138
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络