【摘要】 甲骨文中的“(?)”字旧释为黍是有问题的,从对贞卜辞、成套卜辞、相间卜辞、同期卜辞以及与水的亲密关系、古文献金文习语、种植方式来看,它符合水稻亲水的特征,应是五谷作物中的“稻”字。更多还原

【Abstract】 It is controversial to explain the meaning of "(?)" as broomcorn millet. According to the oracle bone inscriptions in corresponding period and idioms in bronze wares, as well as the planting way and close relationship with water, it should be the character of "稻".更多还原