节点文献
个人主义和集体主义量表中文版信度和效度的研究
Reliability and Validity of Individualism and Collectivism Scale in Chinese Students
【摘要】 目的:检验个人主义和集体主义量表(IndividualismandCollectivismscale,INDCOL)中文版的信、效度。方法:应用INDCOL中文版,对1760名大、中学生施测,计算该量表的重测信度、内部一致性信度和结构效度等。结果:EFA得出INDCOL具有水平个人主义、垂直个人主义、水平集体主义和垂直集体主义的4因子结构,CFA对此进行了验证,其中!2/df=3.173,GFI=0.975,IFI=0.921,CFI=0.927,RMSEA=0.081,各项拟合指数均符合测量学的要求。信度分析发现,重测信度为0.747,量表及各因子内部一致性α系数为:水平个人主义0.689、垂直个人主义0.637、水平集体主义0.788、垂直集体主义0.644。结论:INDCOL中文版具有良好的信、效度,但某些条目还不适合中国人群,需要进一步修订。
【Abstract】 Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Individualism and Collectivism Scale in Chinese student sample.Methods: The original English version of INDCOL scale was translated into Chinese and administered to 1760 Chinese adolescents.Internal consistency reliability,test-retest and factorial validity were analyzed.Results: It was obtained by EFA that INDCOL scale contains horizontal individualism,vertical individualism,horizontal collectivism and vertical collectivism.The four factors were explored and confirmed by CFA.It is found that x2/df=3.173,GFI=0.975,IFI=0.921,CFI=0.927,RMSEA=0.081.Test-retest reliability was 0.747.All Cronbach’s α coefficients of the total scale and four related factors were significantly high.Conclusion: The INDCOL of Chinese version is found to have good psychometrics properties,with adequate reliability and validity;however,several items of the scale are found to be unfit to the Chinese sample,and revision of them should be done in further studies.
- 【文献出处】 中国临床心理学杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年06期
- 【分类号】B841
- 【被引频次】52
- 【下载频次】2645