节点文献

Padua量表在中国大学生人群中的修订

Padua Inventory for Chinese College Students

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 钟杰秦漠蔡文菁谭洁清王雨吟徐晓婧张昕刘军

【Author】 ZHONG Jie,QIN Mo,CAI Wen-jing,et al Department of Psychology,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China

【机构】 北京大学心理学系北京安定医院 北京100871北京100871北京100088

【摘要】 目的:本研究旨在将帕多瓦量表(PaduaInventory,PI)引进中国,考察PI在中国非临床样本中的因素结构,并检验PI的总分和各因素分的性别差异。方法:样本一为1300个大学生的数据(男680人,女542人,性别缺失78人,平均年龄19.6±2.2岁),样本二为30名大学生在初测4周后进行了重测。结果:探索性因素分析获得PI的4个因素:思维失控与怀疑感、受驱使与行为失控感、污染和检查。信度检验:PI总分的α系数为0.96,四个因素α系数分别为0.94,0.85,0.86,0.83,重测信度分别为0.77,0.87,0.85,0.84。女性被试在因素3的得分显著高于男性(P=.000);男性被试在因素4的得分显著高于女性(P=0.017)。结论:PI具备合格的信度,需进一步研究其效度。

【Abstract】 Objective: To develop the Padua Inventory(PI) for the use of Chinese college students;explore the structure and examine the sex difference in non-clinical sample in China.Methods: The PI was filled by 1300 college subjects,including 680 males and 542 females(78 gender missing),aged 19.6±2.2,for exploratory factor analysis(EFA).The second sample has 30 college students from Peking University for test-retest study.Results: The results of EFA has four factors: impaired control over mental activities/doubting,worries of losing control over motor activities,contamination,and checking.Reliabilities of four factors are 0.94,0.85,0.86,0.83 for each and 0.96 for the total scores.The test-retest correlations of the four factors are 0.77,0.87,0.85,0.84 for each.Females scored significantly higher in factor 3(P=.000) while males scoring significantly higher in factor 4(P=.017).Conclusion: The results suggest that PI has eligible psychometric reliability,but needs further study for the validity in China.

  • 【文献出处】 中国临床心理学杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年01期
  • 【分类号】B844.2
  • 【被引频次】46
  • 【下载频次】697
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络