节点文献

口腔压或气道内压与食管内压和跨膈压的关系

The relationship between mouth pressure or tracheal pressure and esophagus pressure and diaphragmatic pressure

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郑则广陈荣昌余革杨风泉张兴洁黎毅敏郑劲平钟南山

【Author】 ZHENG Zeguang,CHEN Rong-chang,YU Ge,YANG Feng-quan,ZHANG Xing-jie,LI Yi-min,ZHENG Jing-ping,ZHONG Nan-shan.Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Diseases,First Affiliated Hospital,Guangzhou Medical College,Guangzhou 510120,China

【机构】 广州医学院第一附属医院广州呼吸疾病研究所广州医学院第一附属医院广州呼吸疾病研究所 510120510120

【摘要】 目的探讨口腔压(Pmo)或气道内压(Ptr)与食管内压(Pes)和跨膈压(Pd i)的关系。方法对17例因腹部手术需要全身麻醉(简称全麻)的患者,观察全麻前的最大吸气压(M IP)、最大食管内压(Pesm ax)、最大跨膈压(Pd im ax)、颤搐性口腔压(TwPmo)、颤搐性食管内压(TwPes)和颤搐性跨膈压(TwPd i)以及全麻期间的颤搐性气道内压(TwPtrnar)、颤搐性食管内压(TwPesnar)和颤搐性跨膈压(TwPd inar),以了解它们的变异性和相互关系。结果(1)M IP与Pd im ax、TwPmo与TwPd i、TwPtrnar与TwPd inar、M IP与Pesm ax、TwPmo与TwPes和TwPtrnar与TwPesnar的线性相关系数(r)分别为0.976±0.030、0.816±0.155、0.923±0.446、0.981±0.185、0.829±0.168和0.955±0.292。(2)M IP、Pesm ax、Pd im ax、TwPmo、TwPes和TwPd i的变异系数(CV)分别为(14.2±4.7)%、(15.2±4.3)%、(15.5±4.1)%、(30.4±15.9)%、(10.8±5.1)%和(9.9±4.0)%,其中TwPmo最高(与其他观测指标比较P均<0.05),TwPes和TwPd i最低(与其他观测指标比较P均<0.05),而M IP、Pesm ax和Pd im ax间比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。(3)TwPtrnar与TwPd inar、TwPesnar间动态变化的r值分别为0.839、0.894(P均=0.000)。结论M IP和TwPmo均可能低估膈肌功能,需重复测定,取其最高值,TwPtrnar能客观评价膈肌功能的动态变化。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the relationship between mouth pressure(Pmo) or tracheal pressure(Ptr) and esophagus pressure(Pes) or transdiaphragmatic pressure.Methods Seventeen patients were involved in the study.Maximal inspiratory pressure(MIP),maximal trandiaphragmatic pressure(Pdimax),maximal esophagus pressure(Pesmax),twitch mouth pressure(TwPmo),twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure(TwPdi) and twitch esophagus pressure(TwPes) were measured before narcotization as a normal procedure for the abdominal operation and twitch tracheal pressure(TwPtrnar),twitch esophagus pressure(TwPesnar) and twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure(TwPdinar) were dynamically monitored during narcotization.Results (1)The correlation coefficient(r) values between Pdimax and MIP,TwPdi and TwPmo,TwPdinar and TwPtrnar,Pesmax and MIP,TwPes and TwPmo,TwPesnar and TwPtrnar were 0.976±0.030,0.816±0.155,0.923±0.446,0.981±0.185,0.829±0.168 and 0.955±0.292,respectively.(2)The coefficient variation(CV) of MIP,Pesmax,Pdimax,TwPmo,TwPes and TwPdi were(14.2±4.7)%,(15.2±4.3)%,(15.5±4.1)%,(30.4±15.9)%,(10.8±5.1)% and(9.9±4.0)%,respectively.The CV of TwPmo was the highest(compare with others,all P<0.05) and that of TwPes and TwPdi was the lowest(compare with others,all P<0.05).There was no significant difference among MIP,Pesmax and Pdimax(P>0.05).(3)The r value between the changing values of TwPtrnar and TwPdinar or TwPesnar during narcotization were 0.839 or 0.894(P=0.000,respectively).Conclusion The measurement of MIP and TwPmo should be repeated and the highest value should be chosen in order to reduce the possibility of underestimating the function of diaphragm,which could be dynamically monitored by TwPtrnar.

  • 【文献出处】 中华结核和呼吸杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年03期
  • 【分类号】R614;R565
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】230
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络