节点文献

经络是“学说”还是“理论”

Channels and Collaterals are “doctrine” or “theory”

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王富春李铁

【Author】 WANG Fu-chun, LI Tie (College of Acupuncture & Massage, Changchun Colloge of TCM, Changchun 130117, China)

【机构】 长春中医学院针灸推拿学院长春中医学院针灸推拿学院 长春130117长春130117

【摘要】 目的:明确经络理论的概念。方法:从学说和理论概念差异的对比入手,依据科学理论的实践性特征、抽象性特征和逻辑系统性特征,对经络理论的特点进行系统分析。结论:经络具有科学理论的各种特征,所以应该是科学理论。把经络定义为科学理论对于经络实质研究、针灸规范化研究和针灸学理论体系创新等方面均具有重要的现实意义。

【Abstract】 Objective To define the concept of meridian theory. Methods Characteristics of meridian theory were systematically analyzed by the comparison of differences of doctrine and theory concepts and according to practicality, abstraction and logicality of scientific theory. Results Meridians have various characteristics of scientific theory, so it should be a scientific theory. Conclusion Meridians are not a doctrine, but is a scientific theory. That the meridians are defined as scientific theory is of important practical significance for studies of meridian essence and standardization of acupuncture and moxibustion, and innovation of theoretical system of acupuncture and moxibustion.

  • 【文献出处】 中国针灸 ,Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年06期
  • 【分类号】R224.1
  • 【被引频次】6
  • 【下载频次】351
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络