节点文献

三段针刺法与常规针刺法治疗肩周炎的对照研究

Control study of therapeutic effects of three phase acupuncture method and routine acupuncture method on periarthritis of shoulder

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈尚杰李红张家维

【Author】 CHEN Shang-jie~1, LI Hong~2, Director: ZHANG Jia-wei~1 (1.College of Acupuncture & Massage, Guangzhou University of TCM, Guangdong 510407, China; 2.Guangdong TCM Hospital)

【机构】 广州中医药大学针灸推拿学院广东省中医院针灸科广州中医药大学针灸推拿学院 广东510407广东510407

【摘要】 目的:比较三段针刺法与常规针刺法治疗肩周炎的疗效差异。方法:将70例患者随机分到三段针刺组及常规针刺组,各35例。两组均取中平、阳陵泉、患侧肩、肩、肩贞等穴,三段针刺组操作时分步骤进行。结果:三段针刺组有效率为97·15%,优于常规针刺组的87·10%(P<0·05);两组治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)均明显降低(P<0·01);治疗后VAS评分差值两组间比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P<0·01)。结论:三段针刺法治疗肩周炎优于常规针刺法。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare therapeutic effects of the three phase acupuncture method and routine acupuncture method on periarthritis of shoulder. Methods Randomized, controlled and single blind method was adopted and 70 cases were divided into a three phase acupuncture group and a routine acupuncture group, 35 cases in each group. Same acupoints were selected in the two groups and selection of acupoints, manipulation of the needle and motion in the three phase acupuncture group were conducted by stages. Results The effective rate was 97.15% in the three phase acupuncture group which was better than 87.10% in the routine acupuncture group (P<0.05). After treatment, VAS scores decreased significantly in the two groups (P<0.01), and there was a significant difference between the two groups in the difference of VAS after treatment (P<0.01). Conclusion The three phase acupuncture treatment was superior to the routine acupuncture therapy in therapeutic effect on periarthritis of shoulder.

  • 【文献出处】 中国针灸 ,Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion , 编辑部邮箱 ,2006年06期
  • 【分类号】R246
  • 【被引频次】33
  • 【下载频次】355
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络